Connect with us


The White House rejects characterization of Russia “Proxy War”

The White House told The Intercept that it rejects the characterization of the war in Ukraine as a proxy war between the United States and Russia, a claim recently put forward by the rep. Seth Moulton, D-Mass., during a Fox News appearance. “We are not only at war to support the Ukrainians. We are basically at war, even if it is something through a proxy, with Russia, and it is important that we win,” Moulton said.

Asked if the White House shared Moulton’s views on the nature of the conflict, White House spokesman Andrew Bates was blunt, “No,” Bates said in a statement to The Intercept. “President Biden has been aware that US forces are not and will not participate in a conflict with Russia. We support the Ukrainian people in defending their country, which is exactly what President Biden told Putin we would do if he invaded. “

The question of whether the United States is fundamentally at war with Russia through a proxy in Ukraine was also raised by Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, who during a press conference was asked what the United States considered a success of the war. He said the target was “Ukraine [to] remain a sovereign country, a democratic country, capable of protecting its sovereign territory. “But, he added,” we want to see Russia weakened to such an extent that it can not do the kind of thing that it has done by to invade Ukraine. “Press Secretary Jen Psaki later returned to the comments, saying Austin spoke of the United States’ goal of preventing Russia from taking over Ukraine and countries outside it.

On Monday, President Joe Biden said he was concerned that Russian President Vladimir Putin had been left without a way out of the war. But whether Putin has a way out depends to some extent on whether the United States is determined to wage a proxy war against Russia, or whether the United States decides to push for a negotiated end to the conflict that Putin invaded. of Ukraine started.

According to Ukrainska Pravda, who retrieved his report to them close to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson told the Ukrainian leader that although Ukraine wanted to sign a peace agreement, the West remained obliged to confront Russia. Biden’s own statements, calling the war a genocide and that Putin should be held accountable for war crimes, could also prevent an easy exit.

When asked about the White House’s response, Moulton said “Whatever you want to call it, this is a new type of conflict and it is bigger than just Ukraine” and pointed to his opinion for Fox News. “But this ends,” he writes, “we can not make the mistake – again – of believing that Putin will stop here. We are witnessing the first days of a new world order.”

The American media and the political class have in recent days sent more and more escalating messages to Russia. Moulton’s “fundamentally at war” comments followed an article in the New York Times in which government officials claimed credit for intelligence sharing that led to the assassination of several Russian generals. It was followed the next day by an article in the Washington Post that similarly claimed credit for the sinking of the Russian flagship Moscow. Biden White House responded by saying it was disrupted on the connections and found them counterproductive. Which direction the heat moves, up or down, can determine if we all end up dying and if the planet left a nuclear wasteland.

Biden has called on Congress to raise $ 33 billion quickly to fund Ukraine’s non-proxy war, agreeing to separate the package legally from Covid-19 aid so that the needs of the American people do not slow down war efforts.

This is not the first clash Moulton has had with Biden. Last year, Moulton called the withdrawal from Afghanistan a “disaster” – and the Biden administration strongly criticized Moulton for secretly freelancing into Afghanistan to investigate the situation. “It’s as idiotic as it is selfish,” an anonymous senior official told the Washington Post. “They are taking seats away from Americans and vulnerable Afghans – while putting our diplomats and service members at greater risk – so they can have a moment in front of the cameras.”

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.