Democratic Senate candidates urge to eliminate filibusters and pass bills protecting abortion rights

“Democrats need to act NOW – end the filibuster, codify Roe, and defend reproductive freedom,” tweeted Wisconsin Democrat Sarah Godlewski, the state treasurer. “This match is too urgent.”

“Democrats need to act fast – get rid of the filibuster to pass the Women’s Health Protection Act + finally codify Roe into law,” tweeted Pennsylvania’s John Fetterman, the state’s lieutenant governor. “We can not afford to wait.”

“Senate control has never been more important: it’s time to end the filibuster, pass the Women’s Health Protection Act, and fight like hell to make sure all Ohio families are free to make these critical decisions without the interference of Columbus politicians or Washington, “added Ohio Democrat Tim Ryan, a U.S. congressman who is vying for a seat in the Senate.

The Democratic National Committee was concise: “Make no mistake: reproductive rights will be on the ballot, and this midterm election is more important now than ever.”

The push from the Democratic candidates and others is likely to fail unless some of the sitting senators change their minds. In the 50-50 Senate, Democrats need every single vote to remove chamber filibuster rules. And the democratic Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona have repeatedly pledged to protect the filibuster, which sets a 60-vote threshold that requires cooperation between two parties to pass most of the legislation.

In February, Manchin also joined with Republicans in the Senate to block the law on the protection of women’s health protection, which was passed by the House, which aimed to preserve access to abortion.

The draft opinion written by Judge Samuel Alito was circulated in early February, according to Politico. The final opinion has not been released and voices and language may be changed before statements are formally released. The statement in the case – Dobbs v. Jackson, which addresses a challenge to the Mississippi’s 15-week ban on abortion – is not expected to be published until late June.

Politico says it has approved the draft, but CNN has not independently confirmed the document’s authenticity. A spokesman for the Supreme Court declined to comment to CNN.

The crowd gathers outside the Supreme Court following a draft statement that would put Roe v. Wade down

According to the draft, the court would overturn Roe v. Wade’s possession of a federal constitutional right to abortion. The opinion would be the most consistent abortion decision in decades and would transform the landscape of women’s reproductive health in America.

Republican Senate candidates hailed the contents of the draft as a long-awaited victory, 49 years after the Roe v. Wade ruling.

“A victory for human life,” Arizona U.S. Senate Republican candidate Jim Lamon said. Another GOP candidate in the Arizona Senate, the Blake Masters, tweeted, “Bye bye Roe.”

The American rep. Mo Brooks said the breach of court confidentiality was intended to “trim” judges before reaching a final decision.

“They are only leaking this to put pressure on and intimidate the court before the decision officially falls,” the Alabama Senate said hopefully. “Pray for life and that justice will be done.”

CNN’s Manu Raju and Eva McKend contributed to this report.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.